Cytological spectrum in patients of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A prospective study in a tertiary care institute

Authors

  • Shivani Sood MD Pathology, Senior Resident, Deptt. Of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical college, Shimla
  • Rajni Kaushik MD Pathology, Professor, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, HP
  • Anchana Gulati MD Pathology, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, HP
  • Brij Sharma MD Medicine, DM Gastroenterology, Associate professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, HP.
  • Pranav Sood MD Gynaecology, M.O, Civil hospital, Rohru, HP
  • Pooja Chauhan MD Pathology, Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, HP.
  • Ganga Rawat DCP Pathology, DDU hospital, Shimla, HP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v8i6.4185

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as reflux of gastric contents into mouth resulting in restrosternal burning sensation. Aims: This prospective study was undertaken with the aim to assess the cytological spectrum in esophageal brushings taken from patients with GERD and there correlation with esophageal biopsy. Method: Esophageal brushings and biopsies were taken from 150 patients of GERD and 50 controls. GERD cases were defined by the presence of classical symptoms of heart burn and/or acid regurgitation. Endoscopically, GERD cases were subdivided into erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Three cytological parameters studied in esophageal brushings were reactive changes, presence or absence of inflammation and presence or absence of parabasal cells. Results: The most common finding was reactive changes with inflammation (56 cases, 37.33%) followed by inflammatory smears in 12 (8%) patients. Parabasal cells were not seen in any of the subjects with GERD. Presence of reactive changes with inflammation revealed a statistically significant correlation between GERD patients and controls (p 0.05). However, the presence of inflammatory cells did not reveal a statistical significance. (p=0.136). The sensitivity of cytology in our study was 68% and specificity was 95.12%. Conclusion: Cytology cannot be truly relied upon and can only be used as an adjunct to histpathology with both being complementary to each other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nwokediuko S, Ijoma U, Okafor O. Esophageal Intraepithelial Neutrophilic Infiltration is Common in Nigerian patients with Non-Erosive Reflux disease. Gastroenterology research. 2011;4:20-5.

Kumar S, Sharma S, Norboo T, Dolma D, Norboo A, Stoban T. Population based study to assess the prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in high altitude areas. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011;30:135-43.

Jhala N, Jhala D. Gastrointestinal tract cytopathology. In: Atkinson B, editor. Atlas of Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2nd ed. China: Saunders Elsevier; 2004. p. 199-230.

Geisenger K. Alimentary tract (Esophagus, Stomach, Small Intestine, Colon, Rectum, Anus, Biliary Tract). In: Bibbo M,editors. Comprehensive cytopathology. 2nd ed. United States of America: W.B.Saunders Company; 1997. p. 413-44.

Giesenger KR. Endoscopic biopsies and cytological brushings are diagnostically complementary. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:295-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Cytological spectrum in patients of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A prospective study in a tertiary care institute. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2017 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 Oct. 18];8(6):325-8. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/4185

Most read articles by the same author(s)