Comparative pharmacognostical and phytochemical evaluation of two species of Cyathocline
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v4i10.391Abstract
In this research work, study of Comparative Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical evaluation of two species of Cyathocline were carried out . The standardization of C. lyrata and C.purpurea were carried out on the basis of Organoleptic, morphological characters, chemical tests, physicochemical constants, UV studies and chromatographic studies (TLC and HPLC). All there standard protocol will help in the further uses of this potent drug to incorporate in herbal formulation or used for the medication in human beings.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2013-10-30
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- An author must submit Copyright form After acceptance of the article.
How to Cite
1.
Comparative pharmacognostical and phytochemical evaluation of two species of Cyathocline. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2013 Oct. 30 [cited 2026 Mar. 9];4(10):538-45. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/883