SPONTANEOUS PERFORATION OF THE GALL BLADDER: A CASE REPORT

Authors

  • Bhaskaran A Professor & HOD, Dept. of general surgery, SDUMC,Tamaka, Kolar
  • Vijay P Agrawal Junior resident, Dept. of general surgery, Sridevraj urs medical college, Tamaka , Kolar, Karnataka.
  • Vasant Kumar
  • M Basavarajappa Associate professor, Dept. of general surgery, Sri Devraj urs medical college, Kolar, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v3i9.614

Abstract

Gall bladder perforation is a rare but life-threatening complication of acute cholecystitis.1 Two per cent of patients undergoing cholecystectomy are found to have perforation of the gall bladder. It occurs in 10% of patients who are being treated conservatively.2 Most studies in which the patients are generally aged 60 or more. Studies reported a mortality rate of 42%, others have reported mortality to be between 12 and 16%.3,4,5 Due to the high mortality that can be caused by a delay in the correct diagnosis and following adequate surgical treatment, gallbladder perforation represents a special diagnostic and surgical challenge.6 Most cases can only be diagnosed during surgery7,8,9. We report one such case which was diagnosed as gall bladder perforation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Bhaskaran A, Professor & HOD, Dept. of general surgery, SDUMC,Tamaka, Kolar
    Professor & HOD, Dept. of general surgery, SDUMC,Tamaka, Kolar
  • Vasant Kumar
    Assistant professor, Dept. of general surgery, Sri Devraj urs medical college, Kolar, Karnataka
  • M Basavarajappa, Associate professor, Dept. of general surgery, Sri Devraj urs medical college, Kolar, Karnataka
    Associate professor, Dept. of general surgery, Sri Devraj urs medical college, Kolar, Karnataka

Downloads

Published

2012-10-01

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

1.
SPONTANEOUS PERFORATION OF THE GALL BLADDER: A CASE REPORT. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2012 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Mar. 8];3(9):391-2. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/771