Processing sputum specimen without biosafety cabinet; how safe are we?

Authors

  • Anup Poudyal BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
  • Shreyashi Tuladhar Patan Academy of Health Sciences
  • Rajendra Gurung BPKIHS
  • Narayan Raj Bhattarai BPKIHS
  • Basudha Khanal BPKIHS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v9i7.4808

Keywords:

Benign, malignant, mesenchymal hamartoma, tumor.

Abstract

Background : Sputum specimen is a commonly submitted specimen in routine diagnostics. Patient presenting with signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection in many cases may have pulmonary tuberculosis as a differential diagnosis owing to its widespread prevalence and vague presentation. When sputum specimens of such patients are submitted for Acid Fast Staining (AFB), primary smear preparation is done in biosafety cabinet, but sputum specimen of the same patient when submitted for Gram staining and culture sensitivity, in our and many other setups, is not processed in biosafety cabinet. Objectives : This study aims to show that the sputum specimens we process without biosafety cabinet may contain tubercle bacilli. Methods : Laboratory data of total sputum specimens submitted from 14th April 2013 to 13th April 2014 for microscopy and culture sensitivity and those submitted for AFB were collected retrospectively. Head to head comparison was done to reveal the specimen from same patient submitted simultaneously for microscopy and culture in one hand and for AFB on other. Results : A total of 1235 sputum specimens were submitted for microscopy and culture in that period. Among them 307 were simultaneously submitted for AFB. Out of 307 sputum specimens, in 29 specimens AFB were found to be present in various loads, ranging from few number of AFB seen to a grade of 3+ in 16 of the specimens. Conclusion : This study shows that every sputum specimen should be processed under biosafety cabinet considering the likeliness of presence of tubercle bacilli imposing threat to laboratory workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anup Poudyal, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

    Department of Microbiology

    Assistant Professor

  • Shreyashi Tuladhar, Patan Academy of Health Sciences

    Lecturer, Department of Microbiology

  • Rajendra Gurung, BPKIHS

    Additional Professsor, Department of Microbiology

  • Narayan Raj Bhattarai, BPKIHS

    Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology

  • Basudha Khanal, BPKIHS

    Professor, Department of Microbiology

References

. Global Health Estimate 2016: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2016. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2018.

. Harrington JM, Shannon HS. Incidence of tuberculosis, hepatitis, brucellosis and shigellosis in British medical laboratory workers. Br Med J.1976; 1:759-62.

. Reid DD. Incidence of tuberculosis among workers in medical laboratories. Br Med J. 1957; 2:10-14.

. World health organization. Tuberculosis laboratory biosafety manual. WHO, Geneva 2012; p-30.

. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US government Printing Office. 1999.

. Sewell D L. Laboratory associated Infections and Biosafety. Clin Microbio Rev. 1995 July; 8(3):389-405.

. Mishra SK, Kattel HP, Acharya J, et al. Recent trend of bacterial aetiology of lower respiratory tract infections in a tertiary care centre of Nepal. Int J Infect Microbiol 2012; 1(1):3‐8.

. Tamang MD, Dey S, Makaju RK, Jha BK, Shivananda PG, Bhramadatan KN. Bacterial aetiology of lower respiratory tract infection in patients attending Manipal Teaching Hospital. J Nepal Med Lab Sci 2005; 7:15‐29.

. Ozyilmaz E, Akan OA, Gulhan M, et al. Major bacteria of community‐acquired respiratory tract infections in Turkey. Jpn J Infect Dis 2005; 58:50‐52.

. Liu YN, Chen MJ, Zhao TM, et al. A multicentre study on the pathogenic agents in 665 adult patients with community‐acquired pneumonia in cities of China. Zhonghua Jie He He Xi Za Zhi 2006; 29:3‐8.

. Imani R, Rouhi H, Ganji F. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance among bacteria isolates of lower respiratory tract infection in COPD Shahrekord‐Iran, 2005. Pak J Med Sci 2007; 23:438‐440.

. Serchan JB, Gurung P, Bam DS, Sherchand JB. Multi-Drug Resistant Bacterial Strains in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections, Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns and Risk Factors. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 2012; 13(1):157-163.

. Wattanathum A, Chaoprasong C, Nunthapisud P, et al. Community‐acquired pneumonia in Southeast Asia. Chest 2003; 123:1512‐1519.

. Khan S, Priti S, Ankit S. Bacteria Etiological Agents Causing Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Their Resistance Patterns. Iranian Biomedical Journal 2015; 19 (4): 240-246.

. Amutha C, Suganthi M, Katragadda R, leela KV, Jayachitra J and Padmanaban. Bacterial Profile of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Adults and their Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern with Detection of MRSA, ESBLs and MBLs. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 2017; 6(3): 631-639.

. World Health Organization. Laboratory Services in Tuberculosis Control. Part II: Microscopy. WHO/TB/98.258. WHO, Geneva 1998.

. Riley RL. Aerial dissemination of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am. Rev. Tuberc 1957; 76:931-941.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Processing sputum specimen without biosafety cabinet; how safe are we?. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 31 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];9(7):268-71. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/4808