Non contact tonometer & applanation tonometer as a screening tool for glaucoma in general population

Authors

  • Smita Kishor Kadu M.S. ophthalmology Professor & Head of the department, Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602
  • Hrishabh Manish Jaiswal M.S. Ophthalomolgy, Dr PDMMC, Amravati, Fellow oculoplasty Sadguru Netra Chikitsalay Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh
  • Nilesh Balaji Giri Junior Resident, M.S. Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. PanjabraoDeshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602
  • Santosh Yadawrao Ingle Senior resident. Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati, Maharashtra 444602

Abstract

Purpose: To study how the non contact tonometer faired against the gold standard - Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring the intraocular pressure, and to assess if the non contact tonometer was reliable as a mass screening tool for glaucoma detection.Method: Patients in age group of 40 to 60 years coming to OPD were subjected to two method of tonometry: applanation tonometer and non contact tonometer on both eyes, after obtaining the informed consents from them. Three recording were obtained with each method and arithmetic mean of all three reading taken as an intraocular pressure. The data were statistically analyzed using (appropriate test of significance using SPSS software version16.0) Results: The statistical parameter used to analyze the data and the correlation of the study tonometer to the gold standard was the pearson correlation. In this study, the non contact tonometer on the right eyes, compared favorably with the Goldmann applanation tonometer as evidenced by pearson correlation with value of 0.921, with p 0.001 being highly significant. Similarly, on the left eyes of the subjects, tonometers was also highly comparable with a p value of 0.001. Readings of non contact tonometry were almost perfect agreement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Conclusion: The current study shows that the non contact tonometer compares favorably with the Goldmann applanation tonometer showing excellent agreement with it. The non contact tonometer can be used as a reliable screening tool in general population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3): 262-7.

George R Ve, Vijaya LRS. Glaucoma in India: estimated burden of disease. Journal of glaucoma 2010; 19: 391-7.

Parson. The Glaucoma. In: Sihota R, Tandon R, editor. Parsons’ disease of the eye, 21st ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2011. p. 280.

Kanski JJ. Glaucoma. In: Edwards R, Benson K, editor. Kanski JJ Clinical Ophthalmology, 6th ed. China: Elsevier; 2007.p.374.

Parson. The Glaucoma. In: Sihota R, Tandon R, editor. Parsons’ disease of the eye, 21st ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2011. p. 285.

Yanoff M, Duker JS. Glaucoma. In: Wiggs JL, Miller D, Azar DT, Goldstein MH, Rosen ES, Duker JS et al, editor. Myron Yanoff and Jay Duker Ophthalmology, 3rd ed. China: Elsevier; 2009. p. 1211.

Ralston ME, Choplin NT, Hollenbock KL, Applegate BJ, Hem TW. Glaucoma screening primary care, the role of NCT. J Fam Pract 1992; 34(1):73-7.

Shields MB, M.D. Duke University eye centre, Durham, North Carolia USA. Survey of ophthalmology Jan-Feb 1980; 24 (4): 211-9.

Kanski JJ. Glaucoma. In: Edwards R, Benson K, editor. Kanski JJ Clinical Ophthalmology, 6th ed. China: Elsevier; 2007.p.9.

Amm M, Hedderich J. Transpalpebrale Tonometrie mit einem digitalen, tragbaren Tonometer in gesunden Augen und nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Der Ophthalmologe. 2005 Jan 1; 102(1):70-6.

Schlote T, Landenberger H. Augeninnendruckmessung mit dem transpalpebralen Tonometer TGDc-01„ PRA” im Vergleich zur Applanationstonometrie nach Goldmann bei Glaukompatienten. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 2005 Feb; 222(02): 123-31.

Goldmann H Schmidt T. Uber Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica. 1957; 134(4): 221-42.

Moseley M, Evans N, Fielder A. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation. Eye. 1989; 3(3):332-7.

Desai S, Sivakumar S, Fryers P. Evaluation of a disposable prism for applanation tonometry. Eye. 2001; 15(3): 279-82.

Fick A. Ueber Messung des Druckesim Auge. Pflüger, Archivfür die Gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Thiere. 1888; 42(1):86-90.

Kniestedt C, Punjabi O, Lin S, Stamper R. Tonometry through the Ages. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2008; 53(6):568-91.

Allingham R. Rand., et al. Shields’ Textbook of Glaucoma. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willliams & Wilkins; 2005.

Wolfs R, Klaver C, Vingerling J, Grobbee D, Hofman A, De Jong P. Distribution of Central Corneal Thickness and Its Association With Intraocular Pressure: The Rotterdam Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1997; 123(6):767-72.

Goldmann MH. Un nouveau tonometre a aplanation. Bull Soc Fr Ophthalmol 1956; 67:474.

Moses R. The Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1958; 46(6): 865-69.

Holladay J, Allison M, Prager T. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients with Regular Corneal Astigmatism. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1983; 96(1): 90-3.

Preferred practice pattern: primary open-angle glaucoma. Paper presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Sept 1990.

Odberg T. Visual field prognosis in advance galucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (Copenh) 1987; 182: 27-9.

Kolder AE. Visual prognosis in advanced glaucoma: a comparison of medical and surgical therapy for retention of vision in 101 eyes with advanced glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1977; 75: 539-55.

Mackie S, Jay J, Ackerley R, Walsh G. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical Mk II and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 1996; 16(2): 171-7.

Piltz J, Starita R, Miron M, Henkind P. Momentary Fluctuations of Intraocular Pressure in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1985; 99(3): 333-9.

Moses R Arnzen R. Instantaneous Tonometry. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1983; 101(2): 249-52.

Hsu S, Sheu M, Hsu A, Wu K, Yeh J, Tien J et al. Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry. Eye. 2009; 23(7): 1582-8.

Ogbuehi K. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2006; 89 (5): 310-4.

Parker v, Herrtage J, Sarkies N Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2001; 85(11): 1303-4.

Jorge J, Gonzalez-Meijome J, Diaz-Rey J, Almeida J, Ribeiro P, Parafita M. Clinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550R in glaucomatous patients. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2003; 23 (6): 503-6.

Jorge J, Diaz-Rey J, Gonzalez-Meijome J, Almeida J, Parafita M. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometer. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2002; 22(6):560-4.

Yaoeda K, Shirakashi M, Fukushima A, Funaki S, Funaki H, Ofuchi N et al. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure Using the NT-4000: A New Non-Contact Tonometer Equipped with Pulse Synchronous Measurement Function. Journal of Glaucoma. 2005; 14(3):201-5.

Shields M. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1980; 24(4): 211-9.

Moseley M, Evans N, Fielder A. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation. Eye. 1989; 3(3): 332-7.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Non contact tonometer & applanation tonometer as a screening tool for glaucoma in general population. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 28 [cited 2025 Mar. 12];9(6):214-20. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/4785