Study of age-influences on brainstem auditory evoked potentials in healthy adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v7i5.3241Abstract
Background and objectives: Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) have widespread clinical utility. BAEP responses exhibit a normal variability due to various non-pathologic factors and age is one of the variables suggested to have considerable influence on normal BAEP responses. Aging changes in the auditory system may significantly influence the interpretation of the auditory brainstem responses in comparison with younger adults. Hence, the study was planned to evaluate the influence of age on absolute and interpeak latencies in healthy subjects in the age-group of 18-70 years. Methods: The test was conducted on 150 healthy adults in the age-group of 18-70 years (75 males and 75 females). BAEP latencies were compared in different age groups by one way ANOVA. Correlations of latencies with age were performed using Pearson correlation coefficient. P value 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Absolute latencies of all BAEP waves (I, II, III, IV and V) increased with age. Interpeak latency I-III and I-V increased significantly with age but a decrease was found in subjects with 58-70 years of age. III-V interpeak latency variations were insignificant till the group with 48 years of subjects but exhibited a significant decrease in subjects with >48 years of age. Conclusion: Age contributes to the normal variations in BAEP latencies. Acquisition of a normative data for different age-groups can improve the clinical utility of the test. The pattern of interpeak latency changes with age in the present study indicates a greater possibility of involvement of peripheral auditory functions in the elderly subjects.Downloads
References
Chiappa K H, Martin J B and Young R R. Diagnostic Methods In Neurology: Disorders of the central nervous system, In Harrison
Tafti FM, Gharib K, Teimuri H. Study of Age Effect on Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Waveforms. Journal of Medical Sciences. 2007; 7(8):1362-65.
Sandhya Dass, Mallikarjun S. Holi, K. Soundara Rajan, Quantitative Study on the Effect of Gender and Age on Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology ,2012 September ;1(1):36-43.
Rowe M J. Normal variability of the brainstem auditory evoked response in young and old subjects. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 1978;441: 459-470.
Sturzebecher E, Werbs M. Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response. A new aspect. Scand Audiol. 1987; 16(3): 153-57.
Trune DR, Mitchell C, Phillips DS. The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1988; 32:165-174.
Allison T, Wood CC, Goff WR. Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Jun; 55(6):619-36.
Allison T, Hume AL, Wood CC, Goff WR. Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Jul; 58(1):14-24.
Mochizuki Y, Go T, Ohkubo H, Tatara T, Motomura T. Developmental changes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in normal human subjects from infants to young adults. Brain Dev. 1982; 4(2):127-36.
Khatoon M , Nighute S, Singh R, Awari A, Ishaque Mohd. Maturation of brainstem auditory evoked potential from full term infants & children to young adult. Int J Biomed Res 2012; 3(12): 439-42.
Trune DR, Mitchell C, Phillips DS. The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res. 1988 Feb-Mar; 32(2-3):165-74.
Costa P, Benna P, Bianco C, Ferrero P, Bergamasco B. Aging effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Dec; 30(8):495-500.
Beagley HA, Sheldrake JB. Differences in brainstem response latency with age and sex. Br J Audiol. 1978 Aug; 12(3):69-77.
Kjaer M. Differences of latencies and amplitudes of brain stem evoked potentials in subgroups of a normal material. Acta Neurol Scand. 1979 Mar; 59(2-3):72-9.
Manjuran T J, Arora M M L. Brain stem evoked response audiometry: The variations in latencies and amplitudes of normal subjects of different sex and age group. Indian J Otolaryngol September 1982; 34 (3): 39-41.
Martini A., Comacchio F, Magnavita M. Auditory evoked responses (ABR, MLR, SVR) and brain mapping in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990; 476:97-103; discussion 104.
Harkins SW. Effects of age and interstimulus interval on the brainstem auditory evoked potential Int J Neurosci. 1981; 15(1-2):107-18.
Rosenhall U, Bj
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Recommended standards for short-latency auditory evoked potentials Guideline 9C: Guidelines on Short-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials.Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology April 2006; 23(2): 157-167.
Patterson JV, Michalewski HJ, Thompson LW, Bowman TE, Litzelman DK. Age and sex differences in the human auditory brainstem response. J Gerontol. 1981 Jul;36(4):455-62.
Chu NS. Age-related latency changes in the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Nov; 62(6):431-6.
Khatoon M, Nighute S, Awari A. Brainstem auditory evoked potential in different age groups. Int J Biomed Res 2012; 3(6): 276-71.
Patel KC, Shah CJ, Mehta HB. Effect of Age on Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential. International journal of Science and Research 2014 December; 3(12): 2551-2555.
Harinder J S, Ram Sarup S, Sharanjit K. The study of age and sex related changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potential. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2010 December; 4:3495-3499.
Matas CG, Filha VA, Okada MM, Resque JR. Auditory evoked potentials in individuals over 50 years. Pro Fono. 2006 Sep-Dec; 18(3):277-84.
Lopez Escamez JA, Salaguero G, Salinero J. Age and sex differences in latencies of wave 1, 3 and 5 in auditory brainstem response of normal hearing subjects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1999; 53(2): 109-15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- An author must submit Copyright form After acceptance of the article.