Clinicopathological study of cutaneous vasculitis

Authors

  • Sudharani Chintagunta Professor of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • Katukuri Pavani Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • Geeta Kiran Arakkal Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v6i12.2699

Keywords:

Ageing, normal range of HRV, parasympathetic dysfunction

Abstract

Introduction: Cutaneous vasculitis hasvaried clinical manifestations. It may be idiopathic or associated with a spectrum of underlying conditions. Skin is involved in both small vessel vasculitisand medium vessel vasculitis. Majority ofvasculitic cases are relatively benignand self limiting in nature associatedwith wide spectrum of clinical associations. The histopathological features may help in the confirmation of clinical diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted atdepartment of dermatology for a period of two years. Patients clinically diagnosed as cutaneous vasculitis were included in the study. 38 patientswith features suggestive ofcutaneous vasculitis were included. Detailed history and clinical examination were done andtwo skin biopsies were taken from each patient for routine histopathology and direct immunofluorescence Results: A Total of 38 patients studied, clinically 27(71.05%)were Leucocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) and 10(26.1%) cases were Henoch Schonlein purpura (HSP) and one (2.63%) was Urticarial vasculitis. Based on histopathological examination majority 92.1% were diagnosed as leukocytoclastic vasculitis. DIF showed immune reactants in 76.47%of which IgA deposits were commonest in 69.23% followed by C3 in 61.53% and IgG, IgM in 7.69% each. Systemic involvement was seen in 52.63% patients. About 57.89% cases were found to be idiopathic Drugs were implicated in21.05% cases, infections in18.42% and connective tissue disorders in 2.63%. Conclusions: Skin biopsy and DIF were in concordance with clinical diagnosis in majority of the cases

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carlson J Andrew. The histologic assessment of cutaneous vasculitis. Histopathology 2010; 56:3-23

Lisa Y. Xu et al. Cutaneous manifestations of vasculitis. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2009; 38 (5): 348-360.

Chen, Ko-Ron, Carlson. J. Andrew. Clinical Approach to cutaneous vasculitis. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2008; 9 (2): 71-92.

E Suresh. Review. Diagnostic Approach to patients with suspected vasculitis. Postgrad Med J. 2006; 82: 483-488.

Gupta et al. Clinicopathological Correlation. IJDVL. 2009; 75 (1): 356-362.

Gemma Sais et al. A Clinicopathological study of 160 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134: 309-315.

Victor M. Martinez-Taboda et al. Clinical features and outcome of 95 patients with hypersensitivity vasculitis. Am J Med. 1997; 102: 186-191.

Eva Af Ekenstam, Jeffrey P. Callen. Clinical and laboratory features of 82 patients seen in private practice. Arch Dermatol. 1984; 120 (4): 484-489.

Leelavati M. et al. A review of aetiology and clinical manifestations in 85 patients in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2009; 64: (3).

Cox N. H., Jorizzo J. L. et al. Vasculitis, Neutrophilic Dermatosis and related disorders in Rook Text Book of Dermatology. 8th edition. Wiley Black Well Publication. 2010; pg no 50.2.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Clinicopathological study of cutaneous vasculitis. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Oct. 19];6(12):938-41. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/2699

Similar Articles

1-10 of 220

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)