A Clinical Study of Suppurative Keratitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v6i11.2454Abstract
Objectives : To find out the aetiological agents and clinical features of suppurative keratitis and to evaluate the adequacy of current therapy available in treating suppurative keratitis. Materials and Methods This study included 100 patients with microbial keratitis who attended the ophthalmology OPD and were admitted to the hospital attached to JJM MEDICAL COLLEGE, between March 2014 to January 2015 .All patients were evaluated in detail for demographic data,clinical features and management. Results: Sex incidence was 60% male and 40% female. The incidence of suppurative keratitis was more between the age of 20 to 60 years(80%).Trauma contributed to 72% of corneal ulcer while there was no history of trauma in 28% of cases.Filamentous fungi(Fusarium and Aspergillus) accounts for majority of infection (45%) while Staphylococcus aureus form the main pathogenic bacterial organism(15%).All 100 cases were treated with antimicrobial medical therapy. 8 patients(8%) required surgical management.2(2%) patients underwent therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and 6(6%)cases eventually required eviscereation. Conclusion: Fungal keratitis is more common than bacterial keratitis. Filamentous fungi (Aspergillus and Fusarium) and Staphylococcus aureus were the most common fungi and bacteria respectively. A rapid presumptive diagnosis of suppurative keratitis may be possible by assessing common clinical characteristics.Most community acquired suppurative ulcers resolve with appropriate treatment.Delay in diagnosis probably contribute to poorer outcome from therapeutic measure.Downloads
References
Srinivasan M, Gonzales A C, George Celine, Cevallos Vicky, Mascarenhas M Jeena, Asokan B, et al. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 81:965-971.
Basak K Samar, Basak Sukumar, Mohanta Ayan, Bhowmick Arup. Epidemiological & Microbiological Diagnosis of suppurative keratitis in Gangetic West Bengal, Eastern India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005; 53:17-22.
Thomas A P, Leck KA, Myatt M. Characteristic clinical features as an aid to the diagnosis of suppurative keratitis caused by filamentous fungi. Br J Ophthalmol2005; 89:1554-1558.
Leck AK, Thomas PA, Hagan M, Kaliamurthy J, Ackuaku E, John M, et al. Aetiology of suppurative corneal ulcers in Ghana and south India, and epidemiology of fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:1211-15.
Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Vasu S, Meenakshi R, Palaniappan R. Epidemiological characteristics and laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis : Athree year study. Indian J Ophthalmolol 2003; 51: 315-21.
Leibowitz H. Clinical evaluation of ciprofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution for treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol1991; 112: 34S-47S.
Wilhelmsu KR, Hyndiuk R, Caldwell D. 0.3% Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1210-18.
Gangopadhyay N, Daniell M, Weih LA. Taylor R. Hugh. Fluroquinolone and fortified antibiotics for treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol2000; 84: 378-84.
Jones DB, Forster RK, Rebell G. Fusariumsolani keratitis treated with natamycin (pimaricin): eighteen consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1972; 88:147-154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- An author must submit Copyright form After acceptance of the article.