Effectiveness of amniotic membrane dressing versus conventional dressing in non-healing lower limb ulcers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbr.v5i5.562Abstract
Context (Background): Non-healing ulcers pose a challenge for a dressing material which will provide an ideal covering with promotion of healing by preventing infection, loss of fluids and the same time adherent to the underlying tissues. The search for such a material of wound dressing led us to human amniotic membrane which promises well with the expectations. Objectives: This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of amniotic membrane dressing over normal saline dressing in the treatment of non-healing ulcer in terms of promotion of epithelialization, biodegradation of the membrane, prevention of wound infection, prevention of exudation at the site. Methodology: The prospective and comparative study done during the period of December 2009 to February 2011 in a tertiary care center. The study group included 200 patients with non healing lower limb ulcers, who consented for the study. 85% glycerol preserved seronegative amniotic membranes were used for dressing in 100 randomly selected non-healing ulcer patients (test group) and normal saline (conventional) dressing were done in rest 100 patients (control group). They were visually analyzed at intervals of 7, 14 and 21 days for epithelialization, infection, exudation and biodegradation and response evaluated by scoring criteria. Results: The observation infers that in 88% of the cases there was complete epithelialization in test group compared to 54% complete epithelialization in control group. There was no exudation by 7 days and membrane peeled off on its own and disappeared at ulcer sites by 21 days in 86 patients treated with amniotic membrane dressing. Infection was observed in 12 of the cases in test group compared to 96% of cases in control group. Interpretation and conclusion: The results prove that amniotic membrane is an effective dressing in non-healing ulcers and acts as an efficient interposition graft to prevent adhesions at ulcer sites in comparison to conventional dressing.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2014-05-30
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- An author must submit Copyright form After acceptance of the article.
How to Cite
1.
Effectiveness of amniotic membrane dressing versus conventional dressing in non-healing lower limb ulcers. Int Jour of Biomed Res [Internet]. 2014 May 30 [cited 2026 Mar. 8];5(5):344-8. Available from: https://ssjournals.co.in/index.php/ijbr/article/view/1011