Effect of calibration frequency on coefficient of variation observed with internal quality control samples for Glucose, Total Protein, Iron and Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity

Authors

  • Shilpi Shloka Biochemistry Department, Government Medical College (GMC), Opp Income Tax Department Office, Majura Gate, Surat, Gujarat 395001
  • Manmeet Kochar Biochemistry Department, Government Medical College (GMC), Opp Income Tax Department Office, Majura Gate, Surat, Gujarat 395001
  • Niral Savaliya Biochemistry Department, Government Medical College (GMC), Opp Income Tax Department Office, Majura Gate, Surat, Gujarat 395001
  • Chapal Debnath Biochemistry Department, Government Medical College (GMC), Opp Income Tax Department Office, Majura Gate, Surat, Gujarat 395001
  • Shaileshkumar Manubhai Patel Biochemistry Department, Government Medical College (GMC), Opp Income Tax Department Office, Majura Gate, Surat, Gujarat 395001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i12.4955

Keywords:

Calibration, Clinical Chemistry, Glucose, Total Protein, Iron, UIBC

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims at comparing precision of Glucose, Total Protein, Iron and Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity assays between lot calibration and daily calibration.

Methods: For Glucose, Total Protein, Iron and Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity calibration factors were derived during lot change as well as daily. Both types of calibration factors were used to derive results of internal quality control samples daily for 20 days. Coefficient of variation for IQC results for both lot-calibration and daily-calibration were measured.

Results and conclusions: CV% observed for daily calibration was higher than lot-calibration for total protein, glucose and Iron. While CV% observed for daily calibration were lower than lot-calibration for UIBC. It is concluded that optimum frequency of calibration differs for each examination and depends on robustness of testing process for each analytes.

Downloads

References

What is Calibration? Advanced Instruments [Internet]. Aicompanies.com. 2018 [cited 9 November 2018]. Available from: https://www.aicompanies.com/

Bureau of Indian Standards. IS/ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence. New Delhi: BIS; 2012.

National Laboratories. Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration NABL-112. Specific Criteria for Accreditation of Medical Laboratories. New Delhi: NABL;2018

Randox. Calibration Serum Level 2.United Kingdom: Randox;2015

Randox. Calibration Serum Level 3.United Kingdom: Randox;2015

Erba Manheim. Glucose Reagent GOD-POD. Germany: Erba Diagnostics Manheim Gmbh;2018

Trinder, Determination of blood glucose using an oxidase-peroxidase system with a non-carcinogenic chromogen. P. Ann. Clin. Biochem.1969; 22(2):158-61.

Basil T. Doumas, David D. Bryce, Richard J. Carter, Theodore Peters Jr., Robert Schaffer. A Candidate Reference Method for Determination of Total Protein in Serum: Clinicalchemistry.1981;27(10):1642-1650

Jesse F. Goodwin, Bramlett Murphy, Marcel Guillemette. Direct Measurement of Serum Iron and Binding Capacity: Clinical Chemistry 1966; 12(2): 47-57.

Randox. Human Assay Multi-sera Level 2. United Kingdom: Randox;2017

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Effect of calibration frequency on coefficient of variation observed with internal quality control samples for Glucose, Total Protein, Iron and Unsaturated Iron Binding Capacity. (2018). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 9(12), 412-416. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i12.4955