Significance of shock index in normotensive & hypertensive individuals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i7.4833Keywords:
Localized Aggressive Periodontitis, Localized Aggressive Periodontitis, Periodontitis, Periodontitis, Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis, Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis, Radiographic Findings, Radiographic FindingsAbstract
Objective: To determine SI index in normotensive and hypertensive individual to asses any correlation in hypertensive individuals.
Material and Methods: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were determined in normotensive (n=104) and hypertensive (i.e. treated hypertensive (n=76) and non-treated (n=32)) subjects in supine position. Shock Index (SI) was determined as the ratio of Heart Rate/ Systolic Blood Pressure and normal value was considered in the range of 0.5-0.7. Recorded data was analyzed between two groups by applying unpaired t- test. The P values less than 0.05 (P 0.05) were considered as statistically significant. To find out relationship between blood pressure and shock index in different study groups Pearson correlation coefficient was determined.
Results: Values of shock index were found higher in normotensive as compared to values recorded in treated hypertensive and non-treated hypertensive group. Non treated hypertensive group recorded higher values of shock index than treated hypertensive group.
Conclusions: The accepted value of shock index is generally considered in the range from 0.5 to 0.7.The value in this range indicated hemodynamic stability in the study groups, since SI were not > 0.9 or 0.5 which were considered as an independent predictor in previous studies for the mortality of emergency patients .To consider importance of SI index in hypertensive prospective studies are needed to confirm the result.
Downloads
References
Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Munzberg M, Wl C, Schoechl H, Paffrath T, et al. TraumaRegister DGU. The shock index revisited: a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21853 patients derived from the Trauma Register DGU. Crit Care 2013;17:R172.
The shock index.,Accessed May 10,2018,https://www.resus.com.au/the-shock-index/.
Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD,Carlton E, Moncure M. Utility of shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma 2009;67:1426-30.
Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E.Comparison of shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:685-90.
Talmor D, Jones AE, Rubinson L, Howell MD, Shapiro NI.Simple triage scoring system predicting death and the need for critical care resources for use during epidemics. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1251-6.
HL Nathan, A El Ayadi, NL Hezelgrave,et al. Shock index: an effective predictor of outcomein postpartum haemorrhage?. BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):268-75
P Bhandarkar, A Munivenkatappa, N Roy,et al. IJCIIS 2017;7(2):129-131.
Ye-cheng Liu, Ji-hai Liu, Zhe Amy Fang, et al. Modifi ed shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med 2012;3(2):114-117
Berger T,Green J, Horeczko T,et al. Shock Index and Early Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study. West J Emerg Med. 2013 ; 14(2): 168-174.
Sing A,Ali S,Agarwal A,et al.Correlation of Shock Index and Modified Shock index with the outcome of adult trauma patients:A prospective study of 9860 patients.North Americal Journal of Medical Sciences 2014;6(9):450-452.
McArdle W,Katch F,Katch V.Exercise Physioloy:Energy,Nutrition and Human Performance. Philadelphia, United States:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;2014.
Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, et al.M. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma 2009; 67: 1426-1430.
Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Van Deusen SK, et al. The ability of traditional vital signs and shock index to identify ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1293-1296.
Toosi M S, Merlino J D, Kenneth V, Leeper. Prognostic value of the shock index along with transthoracic echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 700-705.
Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, et al.Comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24: 685-690.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
