A study on management of splenic injuries in abdominal trauma

Authors

  • Mahesh Dhotre Sambhram Medical college, KGF, Karnataka
  • Shanmukhappa S District Hospital, Haveri, Karnataka
  • M. Shivakumar JJM Medical college, Davangere, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i6.4806

Keywords:

Grade of injury, Hemodynamic stability, Operative managemen, NOM (Non - operative management)

Abstract

Aim: To study about the different grades and their clinical presentations of splenic injury and various management options of the same and their outcome on follow-up for a period of 3 months.

Background and Objectives: Spleen being a most common solid organ injured in abdominal trauma. Successful management of splenic injury consists of diagnosis and prompt management of potentially life threatening hemorrhage. The present study is conducted to highlight the important clinical manifestations, to identify different grades, to identify proper investigation modalities for rapid and accurate diagnosis and to study criteria to select best management option.

Methods: 30 consecutive cases of splenic injury at Bapuji hospital and Chigateri hospital, Davangere, Karnataka, India, were studied with regard to etiologies, clinical manifestations, best diagnostic modality available, different grades and their behavior, management options best available in our setup, outcome and complications. Patients with associated head injury and with age less than 15 years were excluded. Results: Predominantly male patients within age group of 25-45 years were found to be more prone for traumatic splenic injury, RTA being most common cause. Pain abdomen was most common symptom and tenderness was most common sign. CT-Scan abdomen was most useful and accurate in diagnosing the injury. Grade II splenic injury was most common grade and Grade V was most fatal. Operative management was the most common modality of management. The mortality rate was 3.

Conclusion: Even with so many advances in management of splenic injury, hemodynamic instability, higher grades of injury and lack of facilities, expertise and low socioeconomic status makes NOM unsuccessful. Operative management is still most commonly used modality to manage splenic injuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Mahesh Dhotre, Sambhram Medical college, KGF, Karnataka

    Department of General Surgery,

  • Shanmukhappa S, District Hospital, Haveri, Karnataka

    Resident Surgeon

  • M. Shivakumar, JJM Medical college, Davangere, Karnataka

    Department of General Surgery,

References

Gaines BA. Intra-abdominal solid organ injury in children: diagnosis and treatment. J Trauma 2009; 67:S135-S139.

Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma 1995; 38:185-193.

Van der Vlies CH, Hoekstra J, Ponsen KJ, Reekers JA, van Delden OM, Goslings JC, Impact of splenic artery embolization on the success rate of nonoperative management for blunt splenic injury. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Feb; 35(1):76-81.

Singer DB. Postsplenectomy sepsis. Perspect Pediatric Pathol 1973; 1:285-311.

Holdsworth RJ, Irving AD, Cuschieri A. Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1031-1038.

Sherman R: Perspectives in the management of injury to the spleen: 1979 AAST Presidential address. J Trauma 1980; 20:1-13.

Holdsworth RJ, Irving AD, Cuschieri A: Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 1991; 78:1031-1038.

Schwartz PE, Sterioff S, Mucha P, et al. Postsplenectomy sepsis and mortality in adults. JAMA 1982; 248:2279.

Lynch JM, Meza MP, Newman B, Gardner MJ, Albanese CT: Computed tomography grade of splenic injury is predictive of the time required for radiographic healing. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 1093-1096.

Kluger Y, Rabau M, Rub R, Weinbroum A, Chaushu G, Ben- Avraham R, Dayan RN: Comparative study of splenic wound healing in young and adult rats. J Trauma 1999; 47:261-264.

Sherman R: Perspectives in the management of injury to the spleen: 1979 AAST Presidential address. J Trauma 1980; 20:1-13.

Peitzman AB, Ford HR, Harbrecht BG, Potoka DA, Townsend RN: Injury to the spleen. Curr Prob Surg 2001; 38:921-1008.

Sclafani SJ. The role of angiographic haemostasis in salvage of the injured spleen. Radiology. 1981; 141:645-650.

Sinha S, SVV Raja, Lewis MH. Recent Changes in the Management of Blunt Splenic Injury: Effect on Splenic Trauma Patients and Hospital Implications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 March; 90(2): 109-112.

Garber BG, Mmath BP, Fairfull-Smith RJ, Yelle JD. Management of adult splenic injuries in Ontario: a population-based study. Can J Surg. 2000 Aug; 43(4):283-8.

Tripathi MD, Srivastava RD, Nagar AM, Pratap VK, Dwivedi SC. Blunt abdominal trama with special reference to early detection of visceral injuries. Indian J Surg 1991; 53(5):179-184.

Forsythe R M, Harbrecht B G, Peitzman A B. Blunt splenic trauma. Scand J Surg 2006; 95:146-151.

Mohapatra S, Prashad S, Rao KRRM, Bastia B. Options in the management of solid visceral injuries from blunt abdominal trauma. Indian J Surg 2003; 65(3):263-268.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

A study on management of splenic injuries in abdominal trauma. (2018). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 9(6), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i6.4806