Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: A comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i3.4726Keywords:
Daucus carota seeds extract, Lovastatin, antioxidant, Hypolipidemic activityAbstract
Background: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is now emerging as a safe procedure even in patients suitable for vaginal hysterectomy (VH) due to its advantages like better visualization, less post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. The present study was carried out to compare the TLH and VH with respect to duration of surgery, intra and postoperative complications, hospital stay and post-operative analgesia requirement. Methods: Patients undergoing both the types of hysterectomy i.e. TLH and VH during January 2017 to December 2017 at KB Bhabha Hospital, Mumbai were included in the study. Patients with suspected genital malignancy and uterine prolapsed were excluded. Baseline characteristics, intra and post-operative parameters like duration of surgery, complications, post-operative analgesic dosage and hospital stay were recorded and compared between the two surgeries. Results: The mean time taken to perform TLH was significantly longer i.e. 100.21 minutes compared with VH, i.e. 80.16 minutes (p 0.0001). But the mean duration of hospital stay was shorter for the women undergoing TLH i.e. 3.2 days as opposed to 5.15 days in women undergoing VH (p 0.0001). The mean post-operative analgesia requirement was more in women undergoing VH (1.87) than those undergoing TLH (mean 1.01). There was no statistically significant difference observed between two groups with respect to rate of complications. Conclusions: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, notwithstanding its learning curve, is as safe as vaginal hysterectomy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-04-01
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: A comparative study. (2018). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 9(3), 121-124. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v9i3.4726