Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Maintaining Intraoperative Haemodynamics in Posterior Fixation Surgery Following Traumatic Spine Injury

Authors

  • Lulu Fatema Vali Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College and Hospital and Super Speciality Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440003
  • Rajeshkumar G. Dwivedi Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College and Hospital and Super Speciality Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440003
  • Abdul Hussain Vali Intern, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College and Hospital and Super Speciality Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440003

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v8i4.4102

Keywords:

Pyrimidine-5-Carboxylate, Aromatic anilines, Guanidines, Benzamidine, Antiinflammatory, Anti-microbial activity

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus nitroglycerin in maintaining intraoperative haemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery profile in adult patients undergoing posterior fixation surgery for traumatic spine injuries. Methods: The study enrolling 60 patients of either sex (age 18-50 years), ASA grade I and II were randomly allocated into two groups of thirty patients each. Group DEX received dexmedetomidine 1?g/kg infusion (diluted in 50 ml of 0.9% normal saline) and group NTG received 50 ml of 0.9% normal saline infusion over a period of 10 min as bolus before premedication. The intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, estimated blood loss, operative time, intra and post operative complications, post operative sedation and recovery in patients were noted and compared between two groups. Results : Dexmedetomidine had better intraoperative haemodynamic stability than nitroglycerine, (p 0.05). The mean blood loss and duration of surgery was less with dexmedetomidine than with nitroglycerin, (p 0.01). Dexmedetomidine has fewer episodes of complications viz; tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension and hypertension during and after surgery as compared to nitroglycerin. Post operative sedation was more with dexmedetomidine as compared to nitroglycerin, (p 0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is an effective and safe agent in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamics in adults undergoing posterior fixation spine surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Raw DA, Beattie JK, Hunter. Anesthesia for spinal surgery in adults. Br J Anaesth 2003;91(6):886

Palski SZ, Gunzburg R, Sztern B. An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period. Eur Spine J 2004;13(Suppl. 1:S):18

Malcom-Smith NA, Mcmaster MJ. The use of induced hypotension to control bleeding during posterior fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:255

Tobias JD. Fenoldopam for controlled hypotension during spinal fusion surgery in children and adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10:261

Degoute CS. Controlled hypotension: a guide to drug choice. Drugs 2007;67:1053-1076.

Elsharnouby NM, Elsharnouby MM. Magnesium sulphate as a technique of hypotensive anesthesia. Br J Anesth 2006;96:727-731.

Yazbek-Karam VG, Aouad MM. Perioperative uses of dexmedetomidine. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2006;18:1043

Gertler R, Brown HC, Mitchell DH, Silvius EN. Dexmedetomidine: A novel sedative-analgesic agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2001;14:13

Rodrigo C. Induced hypotension during anesthesia with special reference to orthognathic surgery. Anesth Prog 1995;42:41

Jamaliya RH, Chinnachamy R, Maliwad J, Deshmukh VP, Shah BJ, Chadha IA. The efficacy and hemodynamic response to Dexmedetomidine as a hypotensive agent in posterior fixation surgery following traumatic spine injury. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;30:203-207.

Keniya VM, Ladi S, Naphade R. Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement. Indian J Anaesth 2011;55:352-357.

Hale Yarkan Uysal, Esma Tezer, Muge Turkoglu, Pinar Aslanargun, Hulya Basar; The effects of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients: A comparison with esmolol and sufentanyl . J Res Med Sci 2012; 17(1): 22-31.

Kumar S, Kushwaha BB, Prakash R, Jafa S, Malik A, Wahal R, Aggarwal J, Kapoor R. Comparative study of effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine premedication in perioperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy . The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology 2014;33(1).

Subramaniam RA, Shalini G Anand, Study of intravenous clonidine Vs intravenous dexmedetomidine to attenuate the response to laryngoscopy and intubation .International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology 2015;14(2):271-278.

Mariappan R, Ashokkumar H, Kuppuswamy B. Comparing the effects of oral clonidine premedication with intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on anesthetic requirement and recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing major spine surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2014;26(3):192-197.

Bekker A, Sturaitis M, Bloom M, Moric M, Golfinos J, Parker E, Babu R, Pitti A. The effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy. Anesth Analg 2008;107(4):1340-1347.

Ghodki PS, Thombre SK, Sardesai SP, Harnagle KD. Dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant in laparoscopic surgery: An observational study using entropy monitoring. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology 2012;28(3):334-338.

Aoki H, Inoue M, Mizobe T, Harada M, Imai H, Kobayashi A. Platelet function is inhibited by nitric oxide liberation during nitroglycerin-induced hypotension anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1997;97:476

Vanda G. Yazbek-karam and marie m. Aouad; perioperative uses of dexmedetomidine; M.E.J. Anesth 2006;18 (6):1043-1058.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Maintaining Intraoperative Haemodynamics in Posterior Fixation Surgery Following Traumatic Spine Injury. (2017). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 8(4), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v8i4.4102