Comparison of three different methods to detect the production of ?-lactamase enzyme by staphylococci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v8i1.3808Abstract
Production ?-lactamase enzyme is the most common and important mode of exhibiting resistance to ?-lactam antibiotics. Manifestation of this enzyme is difficult to demonstrate in routine antibiotic sensitivity testing. Sensitivity to penicillin is not sufficient to indicate whether this antibiotic should be used clinically and main factor compromising the clinical efficacy of these drugs is the production of ?-lactamase enzyme. Only feasible method for determination of ?-lactam resistance is to demonstrate the physical presence of enzyme. Three different methods (acidometric method, iodometric method and chromogenic cephalosporin method) are available for this. The objective of present study is to compare these 3 method to detect the production of ?-lactamase enzyme in staphylococci isolated from various clinical samples. Susceptibility to penicillin, oxacillin and vancomycin was also determined. Out of total 150 isolates, 114(76%) shows ?-lactamase production by chromogenic cephalosporin method, 110(73.3%) by iodometric method and 108(72%) by acidometric method. Penicillin and oxacillin resistance was 74.6% and 53.3% respectively. All isolates are sensitive to vancomycin. Out of three different methods used, chromogenic cephalosporin method is more sensitive (76%) than iodometric method (73.3%) and acidometric method (72%). Results also correlates with penicillin sensitivity in ABST except 2 isolates which shows ?-lactamase production by chromogenic cephalosporin method but remains penicillin sensitive in disc diffusion method. In case of agar diffusion tests, there is often insufficient ?-lactamase production from the test organism before an inhibitory concentration of antibiotic has diffused from the disc. Only ABST can lead to therapeutic failure sometimes.Downloads
References
Washington W, Stephen A, William J, Elmer K, Gary P, Paul S, Gail W. Koneman
Babb J, Linda J, Hospital acquired infection, principles and prevention, 3rd edition, GAJ Aylife, 1999, p 95-97.
Baily &Scott
Washington W, Stephen A, William J, Elmer K, Gary P, Paul S, Gail W. Koneman
Washington W, Stephen A, William J, Elmer K, Gary P, Paul S, Gail W. Koneman
Baily &Scott
Mackie and McCartney, practical medical microbiology, J.G.Collee, A.G.Fraser, B.P.Marmion, A.sommons, editors, laboratory control of antimicrobial therapy, 14th edition, Elsevier publication, 2006, p166-168.
Ananthnarayan and Paniker
Baily &Scott
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI- formerly NCCLS) guidelines, methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th edition, 1997, M7-A4.
Ekrem K, Meltem Y, comparison of staphylococcal Beta-lactamase detection method, Journal of pharmaceutical science, 2006, 31, 79-84.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).