A prospective study observing outcome following posterior fossa craniotomy in patients with sitting position

Authors

  • Sonali Kore Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012
  • Pallavi Waghalkar Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012
  • Anita Shetty Professor, Department of Neuro Anaesthesia, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra -400012
  • Madhu Garasia HOD, Department of Anaesthesiology, Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400012

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v7i9.3631

Abstract

Aims and Objective: To assess the outcome following posterior fossa craniotomy in sitting position with respect to hemodynamic changes as well as intra and post operative complications. Material and Method: The present study was conducted in150 adult patients undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy in sitting position under general anaesthesia. Induction was done with thiopentone sodium 5mg/kg. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with vecuronium bromide 0.1mg/kg to facilitate intubation. Radial arterial line was inserted preferably in left hand side for invasive blood pressure monitoring. Sitting position was given to patients slowly over 20-30 minutes. Vital of the patients were monitored during and after giving sitting position. Patients were observed in ICU for first 48 hrs for neurological status, cardiovascular status, respiratory and surgical complications. Results: We found significant hemodynamic changes during and after giving sitting position to the patients which returned back to normal after 2 hrs of position. There were no perioperative cardiac events and neurological alteration. The incidence of venous air embolism was 5.3% and it was not associated with any postoperative morbidity and mortality. Other complications observed were pneumocephalous (0.7%), tongue oedema (2%) and glossopharyngeal nerve palsy (0.7%). Conclusions: Use of sitting position for posterior fossa surgery is safe anesthetic techniques and presents unique challenges for the anesthetist; taking measures to minimize hypotension and postoperative complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albin MS, Babinski M, Maroon JC, Janetta PJ. Anaesthetic management of posterior fossa surgeries in sitting position. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1976; 20:117-128.

Standefer M, Bay JW, Trusso R: The sitting position in neurosurgery: A Retrospective analysis lf 488 cases. Neurosurgery 1984; 14:649-658.

Elton RJ, Howell SC. The sitting position for neurosurgical anaesthesia: A survey of British practice in 1991. Br. J. Anaesth 1994; 73:247-248.

Ronald J, Faust, Roy F. Cucchiara, Perry S, Bechtle. Miller: Patient positioning. Miller's Anesthesia, 6th ed.1161-1166.

Marshall WK, Bedford RF, Miller ED. Cardiovascular responses in the seated position- impact of four anaesthetic techniques. Anaesth Analg 1993; 62:648-653.

Ward RJ, Danziger F, Bobica JJ, Allen JD, Tolas AG. Cardiovascular effects of change in the posture. Aerospace Med 1966; 37:257-259.

Miller RA. Neurosurgical anaesthesia in the sitting position. Br. J Anaesth 1972; 44:495-505.

Michenfelder JD. Complications during neurosurgery. Anaesthesia and neuromuscular system II. Auto-digest foundation. Anaesthesiology 1974; 16:17.

Black S, Ockert DB, Oliver WC, Cucchiara RK. Outcome following posterior fossa craniectomy in patients in the sitting or horizontal position. Anaesthesiology 1988; 69:49-56.

Matjasko J, Petrozza P, Cohen M, Steinberg P. Anaesthesia and surgery in the seated position: analysis of 554 cases. Neurosurgery 1985; 17:695-702.

Young ML, Smith DS, Murtagh F, Vasquez A, Levitt J. Comparison of surgical and anaesthetic complications in neurosurgical patients experiencing venous air embolism in sitting position. Neurosurgery 1986;18:157-161

Black S, Cucchiara RF. Tumour surgery. In Cucchiara RF. Michenfelder JD, eds. Clinical neuroanesthesia. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990; 285-308.

Marshall WK, Bedford RF. Use of pulmonary artery catheter for detection and treatment of venous air embolism: a prospective study in man. Anaesthesiology 1980; 52:131-134.

Michenfelder JD. Central venous catheter for management of air embolism: Whether as well as where. Anaesthesiology 1981; 55:339-341.

Brechner VL, Bethune RWM. Recent advance in monitoring pulmonary air embolism Anaesth Analg 1971; 50:255-261

Tateishi H. Prospective study of air embolism. BJA 1972; 44:1306-10. 159.

Michenfelder JD, Miller RH, Gronert GA. Evaluation of an ultrasonic device (doppler) for the diagnosis of venous air embolism. Anaesthesiology 1972; 36:164-167.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

A prospective study observing outcome following posterior fossa craniotomy in patients with sitting position. (2016). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 7(9), 438-442. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v7i9.3631