Comparative evaluation of urine isolates among kidney transplanted and other UTI suspected patients visiting National Public Health Laboratory, (NPHL) Teku, Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v4i6.377Abstract
Objective: This study compare the prevalence of urinary tract infection among kidney transplanted and other UTI suspected patients visiting National Public Health Laboratory, Teku, Nepal. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out from January 2011 to October 2011. During this period, a total of 1233 urine samples from patients suspected of UTI were collected and processed. The antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as per the CLSI guidelines. All the data obtained was statistically analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16. Results: Prevalence of uropathogens was found to be 14.19% (175/1233). 16 species of different bacterial isolates were isolated, identified and among them, 94.29% (165/175) were of Gram negative and 5.71% (10/175) of Gram positive organisms. Out of total 439 Kidney transplanted patients, only 5.01% (22) of urine sample showed significant growth. The most efficient first line antibiotic for isolates was found to be Ceftriaxone 68.57%, and in second line antibiotics Ceftazidime-clavunic acid and Amikacin showed better efficacy. In the total 175 uropathogens, 48% (84/175) isolates were found to be MDR isolates. Conclusion: A 14.19% prevalence of UTIs was found. 94.29% (165/175) of Gram negative uropathogens were found to be predominant. This study showed the significant association between infection among Kidney transplanted and Nontransplanted patients (p 0.05).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2013-07-01
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeThe Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Comparative evaluation of urine isolates among kidney transplanted and other UTI suspected patients visiting National Public Health Laboratory, (NPHL) Teku, Nepal. (2013). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 4(6), 369-375. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v4i6.377