Ultrasonographic assessment of abdominal fat and its correlation with blood pressure

Authors

  • Meenakshi Kalyan Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
  • Shubhangi A. Kanitkar Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
  • Anu N. Gaikwad Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
  • Waleed K. Nahdi Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
  • Abhijit Moharkar Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
  • Sneha Balaji Bhutte Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v6i3.1815

Abstract

Background : Obesity is a major cause of mortality and morbidity for associated metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease. The role of fat distribution has received limited attention. Aims : The aim is to measure subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and to correlate them with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Materials and Methods : Height, weight, BMI and blood pressure by standard sphygmomanometer were recorded in all subjects. SAT and VAT were measured by ultrasonography (5 MHz). Results : Out of seventy-five normal subjects, 32 were males and 43 were females. Statistical analysis was carried out using Pearsons correlation. The mean age was 45.57 in males and 45.81 in females. The mean SBP was 123.910.05 in males and 114.411.67 in females, which was statistically significant. (p 0.001). The mean DBP was 82.58.45 in males and 787.78 in females, which was statistically significant. (p 0.001). The mean SAT was 3.30.9 in males and 2.22.12 in females, while mean VAT was 3.41.5 in males and 4.441.77 in females which was statistically significant. (p 0.01). There was a positive correlation of SBP and DBP with VAT and SAT in males and females. There was positive correlation between SBP and VAT in females and was statistically significant (P value 0.01) than with DBP (p value 0.06). Conclusion : VAT is a better parameter that correlates with blood pressure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Meenakshi Kalyan, Department of Medicine, Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pimpri, Pune,
    Associate Professor, Department of Medicine

References

Hager J, Dinac, Francke S, Dubois S, Houari M, Vatin V. A genome wide scan for human obesity genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 10. Nat. Genet.1998; 20(3): 304-308.

Must A, Spadano J, Coakley, EH, Field AE, Graham C, Wiiliam H. The disease burden associated with overweight &obesity. JAMA 1999; 282 (16):1523-1529.

Kissebah A, Vydelingum N, Murray R, Murray R, Evans DJ, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK, Adams PW. Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982; 54 (2): 254-60.

Nakamura T, Tokunaga K, Shimomura L, Nishida M, Yoshida S, Kotani K, Islam AH, Keno Y, Kobatake T, Nagai Y et al. Contribution of visceral fat accumulation to the development of coronary artery disease in non obese men. Atherosclerosis 1994; 107 (2): 239-46.

Armellini F, Zamboni M, Rigo L, Todesco T, Bergamo Andreis IA, Procacci C et al. The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intraabdominal fat. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:563-67.

Chizuru Nishida, Chittaranjan S. Yajnik, John S. Yudkin. WHO expert consultation. Appropriate body mass index for Asian population and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004; 363; 157-63.

James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Barry L, William C, Cushman MD, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb RN et al. 2014 evidence based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from JNC 8. JAMA. 2014; 311(5): 507.

Kanai H, Matsuzawa Y, Kotani K, Keno Y, Kobatake T, Nagai Y et al. Close correlation of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to hypertension in obese women. Hypertension 1990; 16 (5):484-490.

Cucchi E, Piatti P M, Orena C, Pontiroli AE, Martino E, Parsono PL et al. Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of int-abdominal fat? A comparision with computed tomography. Radiol Med 1997; 94 (4):329-34.

Stamler J, Reidlinger WF, Algera G, Roberts RH. Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) Program. JAMA. 1976; 235 (21): 2299-306.

Trevor S Ferguson, Novie OM Younger, Marshall K Tulloch Reid, Marilyn B Lawrence Wright, Elizebeth M Ward, Deanna E Ashley, Rainford J Wilks. Prevalence of prehypertension and its relationship to risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in Jamaica: Analysis from a cross sectional survey. BMC Cardiovascular Disorder. 2008, 8:20.

Gupta V, Lo Gerfo J P, Raingsey PP, Fitzpatrick AL. The prevalence and associated factors for prehypertension and hypertension in Combodia. Heart Asia 2013; 5:253-58.

Sugathan TN, Soman CR, Sankaranarayanan K. Behavioural risk factors for non communicable diseases among adults in Kerala. India. Indian J Med Res. 2008; 127(6): 555-63.

Gupta S, Kapoor S. Sex differences in blood pressure levels and its association with obesity indices: Who is at greater risk. Ethn Dis. 2010; 20:370-5.

Kalra S, Unnikrishnan AG. Obesity in India: J Med Nutr Nutraceut.2012; 1:37-41.

Greenlund KJ, Croft JB, Mensah GA. Prevalence of heart disease and stroke risk factors among adults in United States. Arch Intern Med.2004; 164:181-8.

Rohrer JE, Anderson GJ, Furst JW. Obesity and prehypertension in family medicine: Implications for quality improvement. BMC health Serv Res. 2007; 7:212.

Ribeiro Firho, Fernado F, A.N. Faria, O. Kohlmann, Sergio Ajzen, Artur B et al. Ultrasonography for the evaluation of visceral fat and cardiovascular risk. Hypertension. 2001; 38 (3): 713-717.

Leite C.C., Wajchenberg B.L. Radominski R, Albergaria Pereria MA, Medonea BB, Latronico AC. Intra abdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism.2002; 51:1034-1040.

Suliga E. Visceral adipose tissue in children and adolescents: a review. Nutr Res Rev 2009; 22:137-147.

Siervogel R.M., Demerath E.W. C, Schubert C, Remsberg KE, Chumlea WC, Sun S et al. Puberty and body composition. Horm Res 2003; 60 (suppl 1): 36-45.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Ultrasonographic assessment of abdominal fat and its correlation with blood pressure. (2015). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 6(3), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v6i3.1815